A programmer needs to store a list of usernames that will be processed one by one in a program. The number of usernames is known and will not change. Which data structure offers the best performance for sequentially iterating over this fixed-size list?
An array is ideal when the number of elements is fixed. Because its elements are stored in contiguous memory, each username can be accessed directly by index in O(1) time, giving the fastest possible iteration performance. A linked list must follow pointers from node to node, a hash table provides no defined order, and a queue enforces FIFO removal rather than random indexed access, all of which make them less efficient for this scenario.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is an array the best choice for fixed-size data?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does O(1) time complexity mean?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does a linked list differ from an array in terms of memory and access?