The correct answer is 'Security camera footage showing a person accessing a restricted area.' This demonstrates non-repudiation because the video provides clear evidence that a specific individual accessed a restricted area and the action cannot be denied. This aligns closely with the criteria of non-repudiation where the proof of an action is undeniable. The other responses are incorrect: 'Video call logs' and 'Download history of video files' do not provide irrefutable evidence of an individual's actions in a high-security context, and 'Favorited videos on a streaming platform' is related to personal preferences, not security incidents.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is non-repudiation in cybersecurity?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does video evidence support non-repudiation?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are video call logs not considered non-repudiation evidence?