A financial services firm is developing a sophisticated machine learning model to detect new and emerging types of fraudulent transactions. The existing dataset contains a very small number of known fraud cases, which are insufficient for training a robust model. To address this, the data science team uses a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) trained on the existing fraud samples to generate a larger, augmented dataset of fraudulent transactions. Which of the following describes the MOST significant limitation of this approach for its intended purpose?
The synthetic data will not perfectly match the statistical distribution of the real fraudulent data, leading to a distribution mismatch that reduces model performance.
The generative model will likely fail to produce synthetic examples of novel fraud patterns that are fundamentally different from the known fraud cases in the original dataset.
The generative model may amplify existing biases present in the small sample of known fraud cases, leading to discriminatory model behavior against certain user groups.
The computational cost and time required to train the GAN and generate a large volume of high-fidelity synthetic data will be prohibitively expensive.
The correct answer is that the synthetic data is unlikely to represent novel or 'black swan' fraud patterns not present in the original, limited training data. Generative models like GANs learn the underlying patterns and distributions from the data they are trained on. If the original dataset of fraudulent transactions is small and only contains specific types of fraud, the GAN will primarily generate variations of those known patterns. It cannot create truly novel patterns that it has never seen, which is the primary goal of the project (detecting new and emerging fraud types). Therefore, the model trained on this augmented data may become very good at detecting known fraud types but will likely fail to identify genuinely new fraudulent techniques.
The other options represent valid but less critical limitations in this specific context.
While GANs can be computationally expensive, for a large financial firm, this cost is often secondary to the risk of failing to detect major fraud.
A distribution mismatch is a general limitation of synthetic data, but the inability to generate novel patterns is a more fundamental flaw for a model explicitly designed to find novelty.
The risk of propagating biases is a serious concern, but it is a broader issue related to the quality and representativeness of the original data. The most significant limitation specific to the goal of detecting new fraud is the inherent inability of the generative model to invent patterns outside of its training experience.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
How does a GAN generate synthetic data?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why can't GANs create novel patterns outside the training data?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some alternative approaches for identifying novel fraud patterns?