A data science team is preparing a large customer dataset to train a machine learning model for predicting fraudulent transactions. The dataset contains direct identifiers such as names and email addresses, as well as quasi-identifiers like ZIP codes and dates of birth. To adhere to strict data privacy regulations, the team must de-identify the data before analysis. Which of the following strategies provides the best balance between robustly protecting Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and preserving the analytical value of the features for the model?
Apply a character-masking function to all PII fields, replacing each character with a fixed symbol (e.g., 'X').
Completely remove all columns identified as direct and quasi-identifiers from the dataset.
Encrypt the entire dataset before loading it into the training environment and decrypt it just before model fitting.
Remove the direct identifiers and apply a consistent tokenization scheme to the quasi-identifiers.
The correct approach is to remove direct identifiers and apply a consistent tokenization scheme to quasi-identifiers. Direct identifiers like names and emails offer little analytical value as features and pose a high privacy risk, so they should be removed. Quasi-identifiers, such as ZIP code or date of birth, often contain valuable predictive signals. Tokenization replaces these values with irreversible but consistent tokens (e.g., '90210' becomes 'A7B2C9'). This process breaks the link to the real-world identity but preserves the data's referential integrity, allowing the model to learn patterns associated with these features (e.g., certain ZIP codes having higher fraud rates).
Completely removing quasi-identifiers is incorrect because it needlessly discards potentially valuable predictive information, harming model performance.
Character masking destroys the informational content of the data, as all unique values within a column would become identical, making them useless as features.
Encrypting the dataset is a crucial security measure for data at rest, but it is not a de-identification technique for analysis. The data is still in its original, identifiable form once decrypted for use, failing to meet the de-identification requirement during processing.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is tokenization in data privacy?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are quasi-identifiers preserved in machine learning datasets?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does tokenization differ from encryption in data handling?