A data science team is developing a fraud detection model for a financial institution. The dataset contains highly sensitive customer information and is severely imbalanced, with fraudulent transactions representing a very small minority class. The primary goal is to generate a high-fidelity synthetic dataset that accurately captures the complex, non-linear correlations found in the original data, which will be used to train a sophisticated deep learning model. A secondary but critical requirement is to minimize the risk of re-identification of individuals from the original dataset.
Given this scenario, which of the following data augmentation techniques is the most appropriate choice?
Generate synthetic data by fitting a multivariate normal distribution to the original data's features and sampling from it. This ensures the synthetic data maintains the same mean and covariance structure as the original.
Use a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to learn a latent representation of the data and generate new samples from it. This allows for probabilistic generation of diverse data points.
Apply the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to the minority class. This method is computationally efficient and directly addresses the class imbalance by creating new minority instances.
Implement a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) trained on the original dataset. This approach excels at learning the underlying data distribution, including complex non-linear relationships, to produce highly realistic synthetic samples.
The correct answer is to implement a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). The scenario requires generating high-fidelity synthetic data that preserves complex, non-linear relationships while also providing privacy. GANs, particularly modern variants like CTGAN or TVAE designed for tabular data, excel at this by using a generator and a discriminator in an adversarial process to create highly realistic samples. Furthermore, privacy-preserving frameworks like Differentially Private GANs (DP-GANs) can be implemented to meet the strict privacy requirements.
Applying the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) is incorrect because while it addresses class imbalance, it is a simpler interpolation method. It creates new samples along line segments between existing minority class points and is less effective at capturing complex, non-linear multivariate distributions. It may also introduce noise and does not inherently address privacy concerns.
Using a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is a plausible but less optimal choice. VAEs are powerful generative models, but they are often noted for producing samples that are less 'sharp' or realistic than those from GANs, as their objective function can lead to an averaging effect. When the highest fidelity is the primary goal, GANs typically have an advantage.
Generating data from a fitted multivariate normal distribution is incorrect because this method assumes the data follows a simple parametric distribution. It would fail to capture the 'complex, non-linear correlations' specified as a key requirement in the scenario.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
How do GANs learn to generate realistic synthetic data?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is Differential Privacy in the context of GANs?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is SMOTE not suitable for capturing complex, non-linear relationships?