Your company's e-commerce platform is being patched with small code changes that resolve vulnerabilities and refine performance. Management wants to minimize interruptions. Which tactic is best to achieve this outcome?
Accumulate smaller changes into a broad rollout that modifies substantial system components
Overhaul the entire deployment during a single cutover window for all pending upgrades
Schedule frequent short updates that focus on targeted fixes and enhancements
Rebuild the production environment from scratch for every patch cycle
Scheduling frequent short updates provides targeted fixes that help maintain stability with minimal downtime. Accumulating smaller changes into broad architectural modifications can delay urgent fixes and increase upgrade complexity. A single cutover approach heightens the risk of prolonged downtime if issues arise. Rebuilding everything from the ground up each time requires extensive effort and greatly increases disruption.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why are frequent short updates better for minimizing system interruptions?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is a cutover window, and why is it risky to use a single one for all upgrades?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is rebuilding the production environment for every patch cycle not recommended?