Which approach is best for an organization that wants to keep normal workloads on local systems while briefly acquiring additional capacity from a provider during usage surges?
Place copies of servers in multiple zones within the same local site
Relocate workloads to a remote service for continuous operation
Design a configuration that triggers extra capacity from an external service when demand goes beyond local limits
Expand internal hardware resources to handle increased usage
A flexible arrangement that triggers extra capacity addresses higher demand as needed without requiring continuous local upgrades. Other ideas rely on relocating everything to remote services or permanently expanding hardware, which may be more costly or less efficient for sudden spikes. Placing copies in multiple zones locally helps with local availability but does not enable extending capacity to handle brief increases.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the approach called when triggering extra capacity from an external service during demand spikes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does cloud bursting differ from relocating workloads to a remote service?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the key advantages of triggering extra capacity over expanding internal hardware?