An organization that stores critical records wants direct control and close oversight of computing assets. Leadership insists that hardware remain in a facility managed by the company’s own staff. Which environment best meets these requirements?
A container-based solution using hardware co-located at a third-party facility
A structure where computing equipment remains under the business’s direct governance and local facility
A plan that combines in-house systems with resources from a franchise provider
A hosted environment orchestrated by an external service provider
Maintaining systems in a facility managed by the organization itself supports strict control of infrastructure and security measures without outsourcing any significant part of the environment. The incorrect options place some or most of the infrastructure under another provider’s oversight, reducing the organization’s ability to handle hardware details. In contrast, running assets in the business’s own building delivers the closest alignment with the need for tight oversight and data management.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the main advantage of maintaining computing assets in-house?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the challenges of using a hosted or third-party environment for critical data?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does using an in-house environment impact costs compared to outsourced solutions?