An organization plans to run code in short bursts triggered by specific events. It wants to avoid the overhead of a persistent system, and the charges should be tied to execution time. Which approach is the BEST choice?
A container-based setup for short-lived workloads
A standard hypervisor that maintains running instances for each process
A function-based model triggers application code in response to events and charges based on execution time. This aligns well with workloads that require on-demand execution without maintaining active infrastructure. A container-based system can incur costs from maintaining resources and orchestration. A standard hypervisor typically keeps resources active even at idle times. A dedicated operating system for each instance leads to continuous resource overhead.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a function-based model?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is a container-based system not the best choice for this use case?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What types of workloads are best suited for a function-based model?