An environment with unpredictable usage patterns and minimal automation tools requires direct oversight to handle capacity changes. The team wants to add or remove resources themselves whenever usage varies. Which approach is best to meet these requirements?
A vertical strategy that increases resources on one component
A triggered approach using performance metrics
A scheduled process with defined intervals
A manual method that enables direct oversight for capacity changes
A manual method works well when teams need to manage resource allocation themselves without relying on triggers or schedules. Triggered methods depend on metrics, which may not be practical if there's a need for constant monitoring and flexible decision-making. Scheduled solutions use a preset timetable and lack the flexibility for real-time changes. Vertical methods focus on increasing capacity within a single component rather than allowing hands-on control for scaling up or down. A manual approach offers the required direct oversight and is therefore the best choice for this scenario.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the advantages of a manual method for resource management?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does a triggered approach differ from a manual method?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the main limitation of a scheduled process for resource management?