An environment with unpredictable usage patterns and minimal automation tools requires direct oversight to handle capacity changes. The team wants to add or remove resources themselves whenever usage varies. Which approach is best to meet these requirements?
A manual method that enables direct oversight for capacity changes
A scheduled process with defined intervals
A vertical strategy that increases resources on one component
A manual method is the best choice for this scenario because it allows the team to directly manage resource allocation themselves, which is ideal for environments with unpredictable usage and a requirement for direct oversight. A triggered approach is not suitable because it relies on automation and performance metrics, which the environment lacks. A scheduled process would not work for unpredictable usage patterns as it operates on a fixed timetable. A vertical strategy describes the type of scaling (increasing resources like CPU or RAM on a single server) rather than the approach for initiating it. The question asks for the approach to handling capacity changes, making the manual method the correct answer.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the primary advantages of using a manual capacity management method?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are triggered approaches less practical in this scenario?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does a vertical scaling strategy differ from manual scaling?