An enterprise plans to move a critical application to an external provider to cut time spent on hardware upkeep and routine patching. They require a solution where all day-to-day updates are handled by the third party. Which approach fulfills this goal?
Hire additional personnel to oversee updates in-house
Deploy a self-managed cluster in a remote facility
Use a hosted solution that includes patching from the provider
Install a container platform on new hardware at a partner site
A hosted arrangement that includes updates from the provider relieves staff of patch management and related tasks. Self-hosting options, such as running the hardware in another facility or spinning up container clusters, still require significant effort to maintain and patch. Hiring more skilled staff does not address the root cause, which is the ongoing need to apply and verify updates internally.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'hosted solution' mean in this context?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the main difference between a hosted solution and self-hosting?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is patch management important for critical applications?