A small enterprise seeks a secondary location that is not active but can be made available in a moderate timeframe. The facility will keep core systems ready, though not running day-to-day. Which environment approach best fulfills their needs?
A mirror site with periodic data copying and redundant systems that reflect active production
A managed off-site service that provides adjustable capacity without dedicated equipment
A minimally equipped location that needs installation and restoration from archived backups
A partially configured location with basic infrastructure pre-installed, requiring limited steps for activation
A setup that retains essential infrastructure while not running routine operations is ideal for balancing cost and downtime. The partially configured option with some basic components standing by can be activated moderately quickly, unlike a location that demands large-scale restoration. A near-exact duplicate is more expensive and is usually prepared for immediate activation. A minimally equipped location is not ready for swift usage. A managed off-site service with adjustable capacity is not strictly a location with hardware on standby.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the key difference between a partially configured location and a mirror site in disaster recovery?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What basic components are typically included in a partially configured location?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why would a company choose a partially configured location over a minimally equipped location?