A security team performed a network review and identified multiple issues in its report. Which step confirms whether the flagged matters are new or already handled?
Add flagged items to a patch list to address them in a standard update cycle
Conduct another system review with an extended range to identify any new findings
Compare the flagged items with established logs to see if they are newly discovered or resolved
Exclude flagged items that have the same severity level as formerly acknowledged issues
Comparing the flagged items with existing documentation ensures newly discovered problems receive adequate attention, while issues that have been acknowledged or resolved are not duplicated. Handing off everything to a generic schedule can result in efforts spent on known items. Skipping any flagged item that appears similar to previously accepted ones misses any new factor that could change its status. Running another review under a broader approach is disruptive if the original entries have not been verified.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is it important to compare flagged items with established logs?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What kind of information is typically stored in established logs for this process?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is conducting another system review less effective than comparing flagged items with logs?