A multinational analytics group keeps long-term files in various regions. After receiving a request for records in a legal discovery process, the security manager seeks a measure that stops key files from being erased while the discovery is in progress. Which step satisfies this need?
Enable a legal hold on the specified data
Restrict deployment privileges to specific teams that manage the files
Enforce a rotation schedule that moves data offsite based on file age
Activating a legal hold ensures data remains untouched until the debate is concluded. Solutions like file rotation or restricting access may help in other ways, but they do not forcibly preserve critical files for legal purposes. Setting an entire environment to read-only can be too broad, causing unnecessary operational limits.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a legal hold in the context of data storage?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is setting the entire storage system to read-only not suitable for this scenario?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does restricting deployment privileges differ from enabling a legal hold?