A company is expanding services across multiple regions but is subject to external oversight for data handling. They need to confirm all information stays in approved locations and present proof to auditors. Which approach is recommended?
Use minimal security protocols to expedite transfers and overlook physical boundaries
Select a host that provides data residency features and tracking to confirm alignment with legal standards
Move core systems to regions outside the chosen data processing area to reduce expenses
Depend on a provider that handles encryption but lacks certifiable documentation of location controls
Selecting a vendor that provides data residency features and tracking aligns with strict guidelines. Other options focus on encryption alone or cost reduction but may neglect location controls and certification gaps. Ensuring physical boundaries are observed, audits are supported, and documented assurances are available is key for meeting external requirements.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are data residency features?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does location tracking help with compliance?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is encryption alone insufficient for regulatory compliance?