Which of the following is the BEST method to confirm the presence of a reported vulnerability that has been identified as a potential false positive by an automated scanning tool?
Re-scan the asset with a different scanning tool
Manually verify the vulnerability by checking system configurations, logs, or performing controlled tests
Apply the latest system updates and patches before re-evaluating the report
Consult online vulnerability databases to find reported incidents of the vulnerability being exploited
Vulnerability validation often requires manual intervention to verify the accuracy of the results provided by automated tools, which can sometimes generate false positives. Manual verification methods, such as reviewing system configurations, logs, and performing controlled tests, can help to confirm whether a vulnerability is indeed present or it was erroneously reported by the scanning tool. Re-scanning the asset or consulting online vulnerability databases would not provide this level of detailed confirmation. While system updates can address confirmed vulnerabilities, they do not serve as a method to validate the findings of a vulnerability scan.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why do automated scanning tools generate false positives?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are controlled tests when manually verifying a vulnerability?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are examples of online vulnerability databases, and how are they used?