Which of the following best aligns with the principles outlined in the OSS TMM when initiating a security test to ensure that it is effective, consistent, and repeatable?
Establishing well-defined objectives and success criteria before beginning.
Conducting covert testing without informing the IT department to simulate an actual attack.
Focusing solely on high-impact vulnerabilities to save time and resources.
Automating all test procedures to increase efficiency.
Establishing well-defined objectives and success criteria is essential as outlined in the OSS TMM, which emphasizes a structured approach to testing. This ensures that the test will meet the specific goals and that the results can be measured effectively, leading to consistent and repeatable outcomes. Answer 'Automating all test procedures' is incorrect because while automation can be part of the process, it does not guarantee that the testing objectives are well-defined or that the success criteria are established. 'Conducting covert testing without informing the IT department' does not adhere to best practices for responsible testing and could lead to legal and ethical concerns, and thus, does not align with the OSS TMM's emphasis on structured and authorized testing. 'Focusing solely on high-impact vulnerabilities' may lead to a narrow scope that overlooks other important security aspects and reduces the testing effectiveness.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does OSS TMM stand for, and why is it important?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are well-defined objectives in the context of security testing?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is automating security test procedures not always the best approach?