During an incident, a cybersecurity analyst identifies a pattern of behavior that mirrors the techniques of an advanced persistent threat (APT). To effectively respond to and mitigate this threat, the analyst decides to reference a well-known framework for adversarial behavior. Which framework would BEST assist the analyst in identifying the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) being used?
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a comprehensive knowledge base that is widely used for identifying and describing the behavior of cyber adversaries. It catalogues common tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that adversaries use to accomplish their objectives. This makes it the optimal choice for the analyst trying to understand an APT's behavior in order to improve incident response. Other frameworks such as the Cyber Kill Chain or the Diamond Model also help analysts understand attacks, but they do not provide the same level of detailed, technique-specific information tied to known adversary groups that the MITRE ATT&CK framework offers. The OWASP Testing Guide is focused on web-application security testing rather than adversary behavior.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What makes the MITRE ATT&CK framework unique compared to other frameworks like the Cyber Kill Chain?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are TTPs, and why are they important in threat analysis?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How can an analyst practically use the MITRE ATT&CK framework during an incident?