An organization has implemented a new vulnerability management policy to ensure timely remediation of vulnerabilities. To align with this policy, which approach should be taken to define and track the performance and requirements of the vulnerability management process?
Conduct regular testing and validation
Establish maintenance windows
Define Service-Level Objectives (SLOs)
Implement prioritization and escalation procedures
Defining Service-Level Objectives (SLOs) is the best approach to track and measure the performance and requirements of the vulnerability management process. SLOs provide a clear set of expectations and performance indicators that can be monitored over time. Maintenance windows, while critical, are more narrowly focused on specific periods for implementing changes. Prioritization and escalation are important for handling vulnerabilities, but SLOs provide a broader, ongoing framework. Testing and validation are essential steps but do not encompass the comprehensive oversight and measurement offered by SLOs.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are Service-Level Objectives (SLOs)?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are SLOs better for tracking vulnerability management than just using maintenance windows?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How can SLOs be measured and tracked in a vulnerability management process?