A Service-level Agreement (SLA) always facilitates quicker remediation of vulnerabilities by ensuring that system owners are contractually obligated to patch within a specified timeframe.
The correct answer is False. While SLAs may include clauses that specify remediation timeframes, they can sometimes inhibit remediation. This is because SLAs might provide certain constraints around system availability expectations or maintenance windows, which can limit the opportunities to apply patches or make system changes necessary for remediation. In some cases, strict SLAs may require maintaining system functionality and uptime, which can delay addressing vulnerabilities. Therefore, SLAs do not always facilitate quicker remediation and can be an inhibitor depending on the specific terms outlined within them.
Learn More
AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the key components of a Service-level Agreement (SLA)?
How do SLAs impact system uptime and maintenance windows?
What are some potential drawbacks of having strict SLAs?