A cybersecurity analyst is investigating a suspected malware incident on a Windows server. Which of the following commands would be MOST effective for extracting ASCII strings from a suspicious binary file to identify potential malware indicators?
The correct answer is 'strings -a suspiciousfile.exe' because it leverages the 'strings' utility to search through all sections of the binary file ('suspiciousfile.exe') and extract ASCII strings. The '-a' option tells strings to output all strings, which includes those from all sections of the file. This output can reveal code snippets, error messages, or other indicators of the file's purpose or origin. 'strings -u suspiciousfile.exe' is incorrect because it only extracts Unicode strings, which might miss important ASCII strings. 'grep 'http' suspiciousfile.exe' is incorrect because it simply searches for the occurrence of 'http' within the binary without proper string extraction. 'file suspiciousfile.exe' is incorrect because it identifies the file type rather than extracting strings.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does the 'strings' command do in cybersecurity?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does the '-a' option signify when using the 'strings' command?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is using 'grep' to search in a binary file not effective for malware analysis?