During routine monitoring, a cybersecurity analyst observes that adversaries continue to adjust their methods, which complicates keeping track of new exploits. Which approach achieves effective coverage with reduced noise when integrating multiple external feeds for detection?
Rely on a single paid platform to merge third-party data with your internal logs for analysis
Enable direct updates from multiple external channels and treat alerts from these updates as critical
Examine each source manually and submit suspicious findings to a local repository
Collect information from several external channels into a correlation engine that compares inputs with local data and highlights anomalies
Using a correlation system that analyzes data from many external streams alongside internal logs greatly increases visibility and accuracy. It helps pinpoint unusual behaviors across numerous sources, thereby cutting down on unhelpful alerts. Employing a single commercial solution may offer convenience but can miss important patterns. A manual process often leads to delays or oversights due to the sheer volume of data. Automatically flagging notifications as critical can saturate the team and create alert fatigue, which disrupts thorough analysis.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a correlation engine in cybersecurity?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is alert fatigue, and why is it a problem?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why isn't relying on a single platform recommended for threat detection?