An organization’s communications department obtains a suspicious video that appears to show a high-level official discussing questionable financial actions. The official denies any participation, and security teams suspect heavily manipulated visuals. Which approach best addresses this concern?
Mandate staff dismiss the footage as inaccurate before running an internal audit
Restrict file sharing and external communications about the video until further review
File a complaint about the source but skip a deeper authenticity check
Assess the clip with recognized methods and compare voice and image data to known sources
Evaluating the video with recognized diagnostic methods and checking the official’s voice or image data can highlight evidence of manipulations, such as unnatural audio transitions. Limiting file circulation or telling staff to reject the clip right away does not confirm authenticity. Filing a complaint about the source without verifying validity also overlooks the need for proof of any structural alterations.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are recognized diagnostic methods for verifying video authenticity?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does voice analysis confirm authenticity in such cases?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is a deepfake, and how can it impact investigations like this?