An organization requires a unified approach for identifying its digital items. This method should accommodate varied data classifications across multiple teams. Which approach best fulfills this need?
Define a single pattern that departments follow with clear modification guidelines once it is initially established
Rely on an external reference document for data attributes with embedded markers inside the items
Allow each department to manage resources with local autonomy, consolidated under a unified naming standard in a later stage
Implement a labeling framework with adjustable structures that handle data classification changes and unify naming across departments
A structured yet flexible plan for identification allows consistent status tracking and can adapt along with shifting guidelines. Storing details in external references may introduce mismatches during updates. Using a rigid pattern with few opportunities for revision tends to lag behind changes. Enabling teams to each adopt different methods poses obstacles when merging those methods. The labeling framework that incorporates adjustable structures supports both standardization and the necessary flexibility.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a labeling framework with adjustable structures?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is a rigid classification pattern not suitable for dynamic organizations?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the risks of allowing each department to manage resources independently before standardizing?