An organization is introducing a new AI-based system that processes personal details. Some team members are worried it could lead to mishandled information. Which approach best aligns with rules mandated by local authorities?
Retain all personal logs indefinitely for reference
Enforce anonymized data sets and documented access procedures
Support disclaimers that users waive their rights to their information
Wait for third-party reviews once production has started
Enforcing anonymized sets of data with documented access procedures helps protect personal details while satisfying mandated regulations. Disclaimers do not address actual handling requirements for protecting information. Keeping logs of personal details indefinitely does not address lawful limitations and draws more risk of unauthorized data retrieval. Delaying third-party reviews until after deployment could result in noncompliance if the system already mishandles data before any external evaluation takes place.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does anonymizing data mean, and why is it important for compliance?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are documented access procedures, and how do they enhance security?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are disclaimers or retaining logs not sufficient for compliance?