An administrator wants to keep thorough records of changes made to a multi-cloud environment. Later reviews must identify who performed each action, as well as the precise set of modifications. Which technique is the best for keeping these changes tracked and easily referenced for regulatory checks?
Keeping logs split among individual environments
Using an automated platform that consolidates entries and requires approval gates
Maintaining weekly snapshots instead of storing continuous details
Posting changes in a read-only area while administrators keep their own logs
A central system that captures events and enforces approval steps provides a reliable audit trail. Each update is logged with a record of who made it. Weekly snapshots miss incremental details, relying on multiple separate logs can create gaps, and read-only channels supplemented by personal notes can fragment the information. A unified approach makes it simpler to validate actions during reviews.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is an 'automated platform' in the context of logging changes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are approval gates important in regulatory environments?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do fragmented logs create challenges during audits?