An administrator wants to keep thorough records of changes made to a multi-cloud environment. Later reviews must identify who performed each action, as well as the precise set of modifications. Which technique is the best for keeping these changes tracked and easily referenced for regulatory checks?
Keeping logs split among individual environments
Posting changes in a read-only area while administrators keep their own logs
Maintaining weekly snapshots instead of storing continuous details
Using an automated platform that consolidates entries and requires approval gates
A central system that captures events and enforces approval steps provides a reliable audit trail. Each update is logged with a record of who made it. Weekly snapshots miss incremental details, relying on multiple separate logs can create gaps, and read-only channels supplemented by personal notes can fragment the information. A unified approach makes it simpler to validate actions during reviews.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is an audit trail and why is it important in a multi-cloud environment?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is an automated platform with approval gates, and how does it work?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are weekly snapshots insufficient compared to continuous logging?