A team recently integrated a new scanning tool into its build process. Each deployment uncovers recurring weaknesses, and the project lead wants to enhance security with each iteration rather than wait for large overhauls. Which approach is most effective for achieving this goal?
Automate detection scans but skip developer discussions to lower the workload
Adopt advanced tests but dismiss stakeholder suggestions in order to streamline the pipeline
Depend on external audits during a yearly inspection to identify significant vulnerabilities and plan a major overhaul
Hold recurring sessions after deployments to assess discoveries, record fixes, and refine development steps
Scheduling frequent sessions after deployments to examine new findings and track progress fosters regular refinements. These repeated reviews engage the team in identifying weak spots early so that future builds become stronger. Waiting for an annual audit delays fixes and risks missed issues, skipping peer evaluations can overlook valuable insight, and ignoring feedback from stakeholders can result in missed opportunities to strengthen processes.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the benefits of holding recurring sessions after deployments?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is an annual audit less effective compared to iterative improvement practices?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do developer discussions enhance security compared to automated scans alone?