A company plans to initiate a script whenever a particular system entry is generated to handle tasks without human assistance. Which method enhances automation efficiency in this scenario?
Utilizing a remote mechanism that starts its procedures after an additional step is confirmed
Running a script whenever someone presses a prompt in the monitoring tool
Scheduling a regular job that runs once every day to check for recent events
Setting up a script to launch when the system creates new entries
Using a script that activates right after the operating system sends its notification addresses specific entries as they happen and reduces manual effort. By listening for each event, the environment can react with minimal delay. A daily job imposes a waiting period and can create gaps where issues remain undetected for hours. Launching a script by clicking a prompt requires constant operator vigilance. A remote push that relies on a verification step might intervene too late, undermining the advantage of automatic detection.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'listening for each event' mean in the context of automation?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the main advantage of event-driven scripts compared to scheduled tasks?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does an 'event-driven architecture' improve automation efficiency?