Which of the following BEST explains why relying only on traditional physical keys for door access does NOT provide sufficient protection for a company's restricted areas?
Because physical keys include a patented keyway, they inherently prevent unauthorized duplication and therefore eliminate the need for additional controls.
Physical keys offer only a single factor of authentication and can be easily lost, copied, or misused, so they should be combined with controls like CCTV, key-issuance logs, or electronic locks.
Physical keys by design provide two-factor authentication (possession and knowledge), so additional safeguards would violate the principle of least privilege.
Physical keys are electronic devices that automatically log every use, so separate monitoring systems are unnecessary.
Physical keys supply just one factor of authentication (something you have) and can be lost, stolen, or duplicated. Because they do not identify the user or create an audit trail by themselves, organizations commonly pair them with layered controls such as CCTV, alarm sensors, electronic key-management systems, or periodic re-keying. These additional measures provide monitoring, accountability, and rapid revocation, none of which a stand-alone metal key can supply.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are some additional security measures that can supplement physical keys?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is key management and why is it important?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What problems can arise from relying solely on physical keys?